SmackDown

LG Optimus 3D vs.HTC EVO 3D

LG’s first attempt at 3D in the smartphone space is a different story. The LG Optimus 3D does the third dimension justice with glasses-free 3D. And HTC’s new entry, like everything HTC seems to put out lately, is polished and worthy of attention. But which phone is the best and which offers the best 3D experience?

htc-evo-3d-front-and-lg-optimus-3d2
htc-evo-3d-front-and-lg-optimus-3d2

3D effect

LG has created menus and software that specifically shows off the power of its 3D. HTC hasn’t really done this yet. Its weather app had some fun 3D effects, but to really experience 3D, you had to open the camera. Neither device used 3D in the traditional menus. Representatives said this would drain the battery and strain the eyes. I agree.there is a dedicated “3D” button that opens up a rotating 3D cart with camera, games, apps, YouTube 3D, and other options full of 3D-specific content. We’re giving this category to the Optimus because it attempts to make 3D an experience instead of an underused feature. Several full games were rendered in 3D, something we did not see on HTC’s device.

Winner: LG Optimus 3D (aka AT&T Thrill 4G)

Processors
Both the devices are great phones where it relates to specs, but the EVO pulls ahead. While there have been a lot of 1GHz dual-core processors floating around the show, the HTC EVO 3D is the first I’ve seen with a 1.2GHz dual-core Snapdragon processor. The Optimus has a 1GHz TI processor.both screens are 4.3 inches, the EVO 3D also has a higher resolution at 540×960; LG’s display is a respectable 480×800. Both devices also have a full 1GB of RAM, but the LG has double the storage of HTC’s device with 8GB.HTC chose to only include 4GB of internal storage. However, where it lacks in storage, the EVO 3D makes up for in 4G WiMax support on Sprint. Despite the word “4G” in carrier name (“AT&T Thrill 4G”), AT&T’s HSPA+ high speed network doesn’t hold up to Verizon or Sprint’s LTE and WiMax networks. HTC’s EVO also has dual speakers, though it was too loud to try and figure out the benefit a second speaker brings.

Winner: HTC EVO 3D

Camera
Both have a dual stereoscopic 5MP 3D rear cameras and 1.3MP front cameras, but HTC’s device simply takes better photographs. The 3D photos from both cameras had decent depth, but HTC’s camera took better 2D pictures, especially in lower light.

htc-evo-3d-camera-and-lg-optimus-3d
htc-evo-3d-camera-and-lg-optimus-3d

LG Optimus has a dedicated 3D button that opens up its 3D menu, HTC has a built in 2D/3D toggle that directly connects to its camera, which has a very nice round button. So for those interested in camera features, HTC appears to have had this in mind first and foremost. Both devices can shoot 1080p video in 2D and 720p in 3D, but I did not get a chance to shoot any moving video on either.

Winner: HTC EVO 3D

Operating System
HTC is running on a brand new version of Sense built over Google’s new Android 2.3 Gingerbread OS. Not only do users get the performance and battery improvements of Gingerbread, but HTC’s Sense is more complete experience than LG’s custom interface. HTC’s new 3D rotating cart effect (check it out in the video for the HTC EVO View 4G) is also fairly kickass. Still, the new LG interface does boast a few cool features like the ability to group and organize applications in new ways.

Winner: HTC EVO 3D

Overall
HTC’s device takes the cake where it relates to 3D cameras, hardware, and operating system. Battery life and price may still be an issue with both of these devices, but as it stands we think HTC delivers a more solid overall experience.

Winner: HTC EVO 3D

Tags
Show More

Matthew

Matthew is a technology blogger for vritesh.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker